There has been a raging debate on whether joining
Commonwealth has any economic and other positive aggregated advantages than
being out of it. It has been a debate marred with perceptions, ignorance and ignoramus
of facts at times, but not all those who put across their augments got it
wrong.

I was privileged to be invited to the Commonwealth panel
discussion on the upcoming heads of state summit [CHOGM] in Malta November 27.
Whether by omission or mission I found myself among them, irrespective of the
fact that Zimbabwe is not a member of Commonwealth. I made use of my presence
at the high-level Westminster meeting, details of which will be best left for
the other day. Today’s Commonwealth has
changed, with 53 member states and not all are former British colonies as many
have applied to join irrespective of whether they were British colonies on the
basis of national benefit rather than historical ties, Mozambique and Rwanda
are such countries. The 53 countries, 18 of which are in Africa have a combined
GDP of $8.4 trillion, $2.8 Trillion of trade changed hands, and this is
expected to reach $4 trillion in 2020. The Commonwealth is home to more than
2.3 billion people (a consumer base unparalleled).
The benefits for
member states;
1.
Access to a market of over 2.3 billion people
globally
2.
Trade and private investments access to $2.8
trillion dollars
3.
Tourism incentives, access 2.3 billion people
4.
Identify and Develop talent through Commonwealth
games
5.
Common Law and language of common interpretation
6.
VISA preferential treatment
7.
Immigration and migration
8.
Institutional building and inter member states cooperation’s
9.
Parliamentary cooperation and democratization
1.
Observer missions
The institution is now run by the Secretary General, currently
an Indian Diplomat, Kamalesh Sharma, and this year 27 to 29 November they will
be electing a new Secretary General, the chances are that the post will go to a
third world country given that Europe has only 3 countries, UK, Cyprus and
Malta while Africa has the bulk with 18. Democracy is about numbers and I don’t
see this post going to UK, I think it might go to Caribbean or Africa, given
that India has had its 8 year term which is a maximum for a country. Contrary
to what Mugabe want us to believe, that it’s a racist institution, the facts
are staggering that it is indeed a progressive group of nations, and ironically
he managed to go to India Africa summit for a stumble of his life, does he know
that the Commonwealth has been headed by India for the last 8 years and likely
to move to South Africa?
No having known what we know of the Commonwealth, do you
thing that Zimbabwe stand to benefit from rejoining the Commonwealth?
No comments:
Post a Comment