Every newspaper and economists have watched Greece’s debt
default with inquisitiveness, why? Why is it that in every report they compare
with Zimbabwe, when Zimbabwe is in Africa far away from the Greek fiscal turmoil?
Firstly Zimbabwe is the only country in
the world to have defaulted for the past decade, having done so in 2001, and
since then no other country on earth has done so, whether poor or rich, secondly
Greece will be the first West European country to have defaulted since 1932. A
comparison with Zimbabwe with unemployment rate of over 90% and a spiralling vendor
economy, any economist will tell you is the worst fiscal nightmarish, because
Zimbabwe has never recovered from its debt default and instead has been the
case study of ill governance, financial turmoil and economic stagnation. For
any post graduate economist in the world to pass you need to study the Zimbabwe
case study, as it is the only country to have defaulted in the past decade, scholarly
it is imperative to review what is already known and what is not known, as to
lay a basis for critique. Zimbabwe study has a multiplying effect negatively,
economically, ill governance, and toxic politics, both asunder by despot and
inherent structural ignorance.
I had a discussion today with my fellow Lecturer at
University who comes from Greece, he was trying to convince his audience that
Greece will not and cannot go the Zimbabwe route, any suggestion that Greece
can be an economic failed state like Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe never crossed his
mind and was pensively in denial, well I can understand but why logical
comparison with Zimbabwe would attract an unwelcome posturing? Well as he made
it clear Greek people are philosophers, well I had forgotten about it that
Socrates was Greek and so were Plato and the rest of the first scholars. Yes
further more he explained in Zimbabwe you don’t change governments even if they
are useless in Greece we have just changed a government and we have changed
many governments before, well well, he was damn wrongly right, wrong because we
have voted ZANU out before and it refused to go, right because we have been
unable to remove the losers, what argument can you make? Greece goes to the referendum
this Sunday 4 July to vote on No or Yes to accept the Austerity agreements with
EU funders.
Greece:
GDP: 246 billion
Public debt of GDP: 175%
Unemployment: 26%
GDP National Saving: 14%
Revenue: 120 billion
Expenditure: 128 billion
Zimbabwe:
GDP: 13.7 billion
Public debt of GDP: 181%
Unemployment: 95%
GDP National Saving: -15%
Revenue: 3.7 billion
Expenditure: 4.6 billion
Why do countries borrow money?
Just like individuals borrow money so is governments for as
long as the debt is sustainable. A country’s debt is said to be sustainable if
it can meet todays’ interests and other payment obligations, and it can do this
if its debt stays at a reasonable proportion of GDP. As long as its economy
expands there is no problem in a country taking more debt, the problem arises
when the share debt to GDP is so high that the government is unable to repay,
what Zimbabwe and Greece are now infamous of. There is another side to it and
that is the Keynesian multiplier effect by allowing more consumption today,
while less gets invested, hurting future generations which eventually cripples
and throttles the economy.
Have you learned something?
Let’s debate; Elliot
Pfebve is a Lecturer at Coventry University, in the UK, political commentator
and MDC Ambassador to Europe.
No comments:
Post a Comment